The great debate
May 4th, 2005Clearly, the highlight of this afternoon’s events was the debate entitled “Oracle 10g - Do you really need a DBA anymore?”. In my opinion, both sides did an excellent job arguing their points.
The “No” team graphically illustrated a life of perpetual vacations and flowing beer as the database ran itself. They pointed out that the so called DBA will be replaced by new titles that encompass the expanding role of information management as technology takes on the mundane tasks of the DBA as it has already done in so many other areas.
The “Yes” team made points with the predominantly DBA filled audience by illustrating that even the most complex self-landing airplanes built today still have a pilot co-pilot and navigator on board to take over if a system should fail. They claim databases will always need the DBA for the same reason. They also noted that the question is very specific to Oracle 10g not version 14z to be released some year in the future. They noted that 10g, though a big step in the right direction, has not totally automated every DBA process.
Overall, the debate was professional and entertaining. Both sides made their points. I think most in the audience would admit the “Yes” team won, at least on a technicality. Nevertheless, the very salient points made by the “No” team gave us pause to consider the changing role of the Oracle technologist.
With this final event, IOUG Live 2005 formally concluded, leaving only the University sessions tomorrow morning. I’m sure these will be worthwhile. I spoke to Steve Feuerstein today about his class and regret not being here tomorrow to attend it.
So I will sign off for now until my next blogging experiences at Oracle World in September ‘05 and Collaborate ‘06 next April in Nashville.
Till then, stay well and thanks for reading!
Tony Jedlinski

